What's the Left's excuse now?!

By now, most of you have heard about this teacher who has berated a student for criticizing President Obama.  Apparently, it's ok to rip Romney, but, not Obama.  The students was asking questions, which, gosh, I thought was acceptable in a classroom.  Apparently, not in the classroom of a Ms. Tonya Dixon-Neely, a Social Studies teacher at North Rowan High School in Spencer North Carolina.  I have searched high and low for this lady's picture so we can see what stupid looks like, and have a face to put on why teacher's unions are not good for a child's education, nore are unions good in general.

At issue is a student who criticized President Obama.  This was in response to the teacher bringing up the subject of Romney "bullying" a student when he was in high school, 40 some odd years ago.  The fact that the teacher brought up the topic opens up the door for debate.  Period.  SHE brought it up, to degrade a student, and yell at him (if you've not heard the video, you really should), is not only unprofessional, but disguesting.  Any union that backs that teacher, is a pathetic, worthless piece of crap.  And a great argument why it should be disbanded.  Second, this student asks a very simple question "didn't Obama bully someone?"  This is a question that has already been answered in Obama's book "dreams of my father" in which Obama says he shoved a little girl.  I'd say shoving a girl is more serious than cutting a kids hair.  This teacher, moron that she is, very quickly stated she didn't know.  Really?  I'm sure she's memorized all of Obama's books at this point, so, she already knows the answer to the question, she just won't admit it.  So, the student answers for her.  This escalated the argument, again begun by the teacher.  This moronic teacher goes on to say you can't criticize the present.  She goes on to stated that "do you know how many people were arrested for criticizing Bush?!"  I can answer that for you right now.  NONE.  Period.  The ONLY way you're arrested for saying something against ANY sitting president is to make a threat towards them.  Period.  Now, the part that the Liberal Media refuses to report (you know, in addition to the story to begin with) is that this idiot is a SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHER.  Clearly, she's qualified.  As a history teacher, you'd think she would know that freedom of speech is protected, even if it's criticizing the president.  Period.  ONLY if you make a threat, can you be arrested.  The student goes on to state that "you'd have to say some pretty f-ed up stuff to be arrested."  He goes on to tell the teacher that your freedom of speech cannot be taken away, you can only be arrested for making a threat against the president.  The teacher then says it's her duty to stop people from criticizing the president.  So, I'm wondering then, did this teacher prevent it during the Bush years?  I doubt it.  It's sad that this teacher has to be educated by one of her students.  Truly sad.  One can only imagine that this teacher got her teaching position through Affirmative Action, as she's clearly not qualified to teach.  However, as always, whether you agree with what I say or not, you're free to make up your own mind, and contact the appropriate people with your support or your own criticism.  I'll include lists of people below, including the Rowan-Salisbury School District School Board, the Superintendent, as well as the Principle of the North Rowan High School and the assistant principles.  I have e-mailed my letter to them (see below), feel free to contact them with your support or digust.

Board Member Contact Information
	Dr. James (Jim) W. Emerson - Chairperson  704.636.2945 (h) emersonjw@rss.k12.nc.us		Mrs. W. Jean Kennedy - Vice-Chairperson 704.633-7428 (h) kennedywj@rss.k12.nc.us
	Mr. Bryce P. Beard, III 704.633.1046 (h) beardbp@rss.k12.nc.us		Dr. Richard Miller 704-637-0318(h) millerrw@rss.k12.nc.us
	Mrs. Linda A. Freeze 1607 Safrit Road Salisbury, NC 28146 704.857.3432 (h) freezela@rss.k12.nc.us		Mrs. Kay Wright Norman 704.636.3654 (h) normankw@rss.k12.nc.us
Mr. Mike Caskey 704-932-1380 caskeymd@rss.k12.nc.us North Rowan High School 300 North Whitehead Avenue Spencer, NC 28159 (704) 636-4420 . Darrell McDowell Antoine Brisbon Sharon Bracey Harriet Wood Principal Assistant Principal Assistant Principal Assistant Principal mcdowelldg@rss.k12.nc.us brisbonal@rss.k12.nc.us braceysa@rss.k12.nc.us woodhh@rss.k12.nc.us		Dear Rowan Salisbury School District, I have read with both disgust and bewilderment the situation in North Rowan High School regarding Ms. Tonya Dixon-Neely and her poor treatment of a student regarding his differing opinion of the student.  As a former teacher myself, teachers are not supposed indoctrinate.  How it can be said that this teacher is doing anything other than indoctrinating is beyond me.  From what the student says regarding this teacher, this has been a problem for some time, and I imagine others have complained about it.  So, I can only assume that you’re fine with the way she forces her views onto others, and then yells at them if they disagree.  And if you truly doubt she was yelling, you should listen to the You Tube video.  What exactly are this woman’s qualifications?  She’s supposed to be a history teacher, yet, she’s so ignorant that she doesn’t even know that the ONLY way you can get arrested regarding the president is if you threaten them.  You are free to critique the president to your heart’s content.  Further still, she can only be said to be stupid in that she feels that many were arrested for critiquing Bush.  However, we all know that not to be true!  Harry Reid referred to Bush as “dumb” and “stupid” in front of elementary school kids.  He never got arrested.  Many were calling Bush “Hitler” and none of them got arrested, certainly none in the Democratic Party.  And then you suspend this teacher for a week, WITH pay.  How disgusting.  She has proven that she is not qualified to teach as she omitted several facts that should be basic, including what it takes to be arrested in regards to the president.  I can only assume that, as she’s not qualified, she must have been hired as a result of Affirmative Action.  I would hope that, after all the media buzz regarding this issue, and the tape that was made, you would reconsider her suspension with pay.  I think it’s completely appropriate for her to be suspended the rest of the school year, without pay, plus, I think it’s appropriate for her to take a Sensitivity Class, to be more tolerant and sensitive to other view points, particularly when she clearly has no idea what she’s talking about. Sincerely, Reese Copeland Yakima, Wa.

Wow, ANOTHER isolated incident. Occupy seems to have a LOT of those!

Well, it is two days after the "big rally" of the Occupy morons.  From what I saw on the news, it appeared to be more of a "spark and fizzle" than an explosion.  Of course, Occupy would not have you believe that.  But what do you expect from a group that has the blessings of Libs across the land, including our president and the DNC, and who has an out right hatred for capitalism.  Guess that's why they're all using their I-Phones and Blackberry phones at the gatherings, huh?  We know that Rolling Stone is VERY supportive of Occupy as their recent article interviewing President Obama in which they called the police presence and their handling of the events at Zucati Park "illegal".  Actually Rolling Stone, it was PERFECTLY LEGAL.  Why?  Because the Occupy protestors had been told they couldn't camp out in Zucati Park as it's a PRIVATE Park, not a public one.  They had been given many chances to clear out.  There was HEAVY drug use, people having sex in public and MULTIPLE RAPES.  The US Constitution guarantees the right to PEACEABLY protest.  Clearly, these folks were not protesting peacefully.  Henceforth, after MULTIPLE warnings to leave, they were removed.  When they met resistance, the police handled it appropriately. 

Recently, we had 5 idiots who tried to bomb a bridge in Brecksville, Ohio.  Now, despite what the Libs will tell you, they WERE associated with the local Occupy movement in Cleveland.  The difference being, the 5 idiots felt that the Occupy movement was not VIOLENT ENOUGH."  Apparently, rape and craping on police cars is not violent enough.  Threatening to fire bomb the Macy's store in New York City, that's not violence enough.  Looting and smashing windows is not violent enough, nor is attacking cops. 

The Occupy movement in Cleveland was VERY quick to distance themselves from the 5 idiots.  They stated "in no way representing or acting on behalf of Occupy Cleveland."  And big shock, the Liberal media seems to be giving Occupy a pass on this.  Gosh, it seems to me that the SMALL handful where people did show up to Tea Party rallies holding racist signs, they were told to leave, but no matter what the Tea Party did to distance themselves from them, Libs wouldn't let it go.  The whole movement was condemed.  And the bombing was just ONE of MANY problems they've had.  The rapes, the looting, the destruction of personal property, the Anti-Semetic remarks, the intimidation, staking out CEO's private homes, open drug use, craping on cars, smashing windows.  Oh, but Libs forgive ALL of that.  Those are "isolated incidences", but they just seem to happen at most of the rallies, but oh, they're all isolated incidences.  Just an aweful LOT of them I guess.  Oh, the others that show up at Tea Party rallies were LIBS holding racist signs to PROVE how racist the Tea Party was.  But funny, the LIBS were the only ones there holding racist signs.  Funny.....

Going back to the morons who wanted to blow up the bridge, they did at least say they wanted to limit any innocent casualities, but, they felt that blowing up the bridge would cost corporations a lot to fix it.  Hey moron, how many corporations you know that build bridges?  Last I knew, the STATE took care of that stuff.  So, essentially, you want to cost the STATE a lot of money, and likely, Ohio is probably not HUGE in the black as most states are struggling financially.  The 5 morons also said that another reason to blow up the bridge was "because it's going to stop a lot of people going to work."  Great, so, they can't get to their jobs, and so they'll miss on our their day's wages.  Henceforth putting them in a worse off position.  Essentially, potentially making them poorer than they already may be.  Great.  You guys sure are geniuses.