Wow, ANOTHER isolated incident. Occupy seems to have a LOT of those!

Well, it is two days after the "big rally" of the Occupy morons.  From what I saw on the news, it appeared to be more of a "spark and fizzle" than an explosion.  Of course, Occupy would not have you believe that.  But what do you expect from a group that has the blessings of Libs across the land, including our president and the DNC, and who has an out right hatred for capitalism.  Guess that's why they're all using their I-Phones and Blackberry phones at the gatherings, huh?  We know that Rolling Stone is VERY supportive of Occupy as their recent article interviewing President Obama in which they called the police presence and their handling of the events at Zucati Park "illegal".  Actually Rolling Stone, it was PERFECTLY LEGAL.  Why?  Because the Occupy protestors had been told they couldn't camp out in Zucati Park as it's a PRIVATE Park, not a public one.  They had been given many chances to clear out.  There was HEAVY drug use, people having sex in public and MULTIPLE RAPES.  The US Constitution guarantees the right to PEACEABLY protest.  Clearly, these folks were not protesting peacefully.  Henceforth, after MULTIPLE warnings to leave, they were removed.  When they met resistance, the police handled it appropriately. 

Recently, we had 5 idiots who tried to bomb a bridge in Brecksville, Ohio.  Now, despite what the Libs will tell you, they WERE associated with the local Occupy movement in Cleveland.  The difference being, the 5 idiots felt that the Occupy movement was not VIOLENT ENOUGH."  Apparently, rape and craping on police cars is not violent enough.  Threatening to fire bomb the Macy's store in New York City, that's not violence enough.  Looting and smashing windows is not violent enough, nor is attacking cops. 

The Occupy movement in Cleveland was VERY quick to distance themselves from the 5 idiots.  They stated "in no way representing or acting on behalf of Occupy Cleveland."  And big shock, the Liberal media seems to be giving Occupy a pass on this.  Gosh, it seems to me that the SMALL handful where people did show up to Tea Party rallies holding racist signs, they were told to leave, but no matter what the Tea Party did to distance themselves from them, Libs wouldn't let it go.  The whole movement was condemed.  And the bombing was just ONE of MANY problems they've had.  The rapes, the looting, the destruction of personal property, the Anti-Semetic remarks, the intimidation, staking out CEO's private homes, open drug use, craping on cars, smashing windows.  Oh, but Libs forgive ALL of that.  Those are "isolated incidences", but they just seem to happen at most of the rallies, but oh, they're all isolated incidences.  Just an aweful LOT of them I guess.  Oh, the others that show up at Tea Party rallies were LIBS holding racist signs to PROVE how racist the Tea Party was.  But funny, the LIBS were the only ones there holding racist signs.  Funny.....

Going back to the morons who wanted to blow up the bridge, they did at least say they wanted to limit any innocent casualities, but, they felt that blowing up the bridge would cost corporations a lot to fix it.  Hey moron, how many corporations you know that build bridges?  Last I knew, the STATE took care of that stuff.  So, essentially, you want to cost the STATE a lot of money, and likely, Ohio is probably not HUGE in the black as most states are struggling financially.  The 5 morons also said that another reason to blow up the bridge was "because it's going to stop a lot of people going to work."  Great, so, they can't get to their jobs, and so they'll miss on our their day's wages.  Henceforth putting them in a worse off position.  Essentially, potentially making them poorer than they already may be.  Great.  You guys sure are geniuses.