Way to tone down the rhetoric!

Liberals, always the leaders of proper attitude and experts in politeness, have been chanting to turn down the rhetoric and to speak in a civilized tone. There have, of course, been many instances in which Democrats have violated their own rules here. The most recent example of this is when Obama was FORCED to release the full version of his birth certificate because he chose to ignore the controversy now for almost 2 1/2 years about his being born in the US. He states you can't have that from Hawaii, however, he made a special request and, as he is the president, it was granted. Gosh, couldn't you have granted that 2 1/2 years ago? Seems you could have. He has been pestered and bugged and nagged and such, and he still refused to do it. Then of course, he states that this shouldn't be a side show with a barker yelling about this whole thing. Well gosh Obama. You couldn't have been talking about Donald Trump, could you?! This is the same Liberal that has lectured us on toning down the rhetoric and speaking civilly, yet, here he is referring to someone else, as a carnival/side show barker. Yet another example of "do as I say, not as I do."

The next example, and the point I'd like to bring to today's column, is, wow-shocker, a Liberal who's a teaching at a PUBLIC university in Iowa. Her name is Ellen Lewin. She teaches, of all things, Anthropology. The college Republicans sent out an e-mail to the student body and staff at the school, promoting their coming out week for Republican issues, ideas and information. Now, I imagine the college Democrats there do something similar to advertise their events. Now, most people, if they think the college Republicans are BS, fine, they delete the message. But a Liberal, always the ever tolerant one and the leaders in civility, seem to have slipped this time. Oh crap, they never slip, they just do it intentionally. You know, the "do as I say, not as I do" thing. I would call her Dr. Lewin, but, given her reply to the e-mail, she deserves NO respect. Ellen, sent back a response that stated "F--k you Republicans". Yep, that was her response. Just that, nothing else. So, a copy of this e-mail with Ellen's response was sent to her two supervisors. A piss poor "apology" came back from Ellen stating she was sorry for hurting the college Republicans delicate sensibilities. Then, another e-mail was sent from Ellen stating her critique of all the things she didn't like about the coming out week. So clearly, she put some thought into it. One can only wonder how much thought could come from such a mental midget who would simply state "F--k you Republicans" in an e-mail with her name clearly on it. She's a real genius she is. Just look at her picture, if that doesn't scream intellectual superiority....

Actually, she's got a very arrogant stance and facial expression. Is that a judgement? You bet, but at least it's not "F--k you!"

A complaint was then filed with the Provost that would be in charge of that department or specific school in the university. Now, when that happens, according to the leader of the college Republicans, Natalie Ginty, an investigation is supposed to be conducted. Well, the e-mail has Ellen's name and e-mail address on it, so, should be a pretty short investigation unless she'll claim someone hacked into her account. Again though, she's a genius cause if she was going to claim that, you'd think she'd have claimed that after her supervisor was informed.

So, will this go anywhere? Probably not because, as we all know, Libs rule the schools. Anyone that challenges that territory will be met with all kinds of "toning the rhetoric" things such as "racist", "targeting freedom of speech" etc. Well, I have a simple idea here, something I think that warrants pointing out, and, I'd like to thank many Libs for it including Harry Reid and San Fran Nan Pelosi among other Libs.

When Sarah Palin had targets on various districts for the House that were "vulnerable" meaning a Republican could take the race over a Democrat, she was met with cries of targeting people and marking them for being attacked among other things. This was primarily after that congresswoman in Arizona was shot. Never mind the DNC had bull's eyes on Republican districts of their own. Oh no, that's not the same thing at all. And, Libs are always quick to point out "hate speech" or inciting violence or some such crap. So, I'd like to use that here and throw that back at the Libs.

Ellen's response, again, was "f--k you Republicans". Now keep in mind, Ellen had the whole word, not a couple dashes. So, going along the lines of the logic of the Libs here, it seems to me, that Ellen could be charged with hate speech. She is clearly promoting the raping of Republicans or at least, sexual violence towards republicans. It's right there! Can't you see it? "F--k you Republicans." Further, it has Ellen's name attached to the e-mail. And, she's not claimed her account was hacked into. She made a piss poor apology, so, she basically admitted it. So, I think she should be charged with hate speech. Clearly, she's inciting violence against the college Republicans. If any of the college Republicans, or any Republicans for that matter, are sexually violated, experience sexual violence or are raped, well, Ellen should be charged with inciting that. That's the standard that Libs have set here right, I mean with the targets and such. So, I'm just using THEIR logic, right? So, Ellen needs to be charged with hate speech and trying to incite violence against college Republicans and Republicans in general, of a sexual nature.

Now, there are some Libs out there that will be "oh, come on!" Well, that's what I said about the targets with Sarah Palin, but that was all "no, she's inciting violence!"

So, below, you will find Ellen's contact information. Please feel free to support her in her inciting sexual violence against college Republicans and Republicans in general if you agree with her, or, write her and tell her you disagree with her, and that she should be charged with hate speech or trying to incite sexual violence, if you wish to do so. Or, you can do what Ellen should have done. Nothing. Myself, I'll be contacting her to let her know I think she acted very inappropriately and that clearly, if you send in enough cereal box tops, I too can have a PHD.

Ellen Lewin

Phone: 319-335-1610

E-mail: ellen-lewing@uiowa.edu

Hey Obama, who's in charge buddy?

Recently, our outstanding leader noticed that gas prices are high. This, from a guy that has previously said, he simply wished the rise was more gradual, not that it went up at all. When gas was going up when he was running for president, his solution to solving the price of gas problem was to check the air in your tires and that it's right (it can reduce mileage by 10%) and to make sure your car is tuned up properly. Granted, these can help, but, is it really addressing the problem? No. In the last couple of week, President Obama has made many stupid (I'm sorry, that's just the only word for it), remarks regarding the price of gas. He berated one person at a "town hall" type meeting when a citizen brought up the price of gas and he was having trouble affording it. The citizen complained about the gas price and what was his solution. THe response? What kind of car do you drive? The citizen stated it was a Suburban. Obama's response? "Buy a different car, it's not like you have 10 kids or anything." The citizen went on to state that yes, he actually did have 10 kids, and how could he afford a new car when he couldn't afford gas that well. This is the stupidity of our president. Not to mention, insenitive. That's a Lib for you. They tell us all they want about OUR insensitivity, then tell someone to go buy a different car when they have a big family. Well gosh President idiot, if the guy can't afford gas that can hall his kids in ONE trip, how can he afford 2-3 Prius' to hall all his kids, or, make several trips in one Prius? Wouldn't it make more sense to make ONE trip, even if it's in something as big as a Suburban? And what about Obama's vehicle? Hmmm? I don't see him struttin' around in a black, dark tinted Prius as opposed to the stretch Limo he's in, or the Tahoe's he's in. Why doesn't he ride around in a Prius? Hmm?

Next, very recently I might add, he states that gas is high and he knew it took "a big chunk of your check just to drive to work". He then berated oil companies and how we should stop the tax breaks for them. That's the problem. We have tax breaks for them. It's nothing to do with Obama banning off shore oil drilling. It has nothing to do with not building more oil refineries, or, nothing to do with drilling for our own oil. Right. Nothing to do with that at all President Idiot. When gas was this much, Bush caught a lot of crap for it! But now that it's happening under Obama's watch, guess what? It's not Obama's fault! Oh no! That is complete BS. HE is in charge. HE is responsible. He refuses to do things that will lower the price of gas. Period. YOU refuse to drill, YOU ban it offshore, YOU are creating less supply while there is continued demand. YOU are responsible. YOU are in charge. The Libs need to grow a pair and take responsibility for THEIR guy. HE is calling the shots now. Period. If Libs out there disagree, by all mean, feel free to just give the guy at 7-11 or AM/PM EXTRA money when you go buy gas. Otherwise, shut yer yap! Gas prices hurt EVERYONE. It hurts business, it hurts the middle class and the poor. The people you CLAIM you fight for. And you're screwing them over. Good Job. Guess OBAMA really does mean One Big A## Mistake America! If you agree or disagree with me, feel free to contact the president and rip him a new one for the price of gas, or, if you're a Lib, demand the price goes higher!

president@whitehouse.gov

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW

Washington, D.C. 20500

(202)456-1414

Hey, where's all the femanists on this?

Recently, Keith Olberman, whom I have yet to find anyone who watched his show, made quite the disturbing "tweet" regarding Conservative female commentator, S.E. Cupp. Olberman stated on Twitter.com "On some many levels, she's a perfect demonstration of the necessity of the workPlanned Parenthood does". Ok, now what exactly would warrant a remark such as this from the attention seeking Olberman? Hold on to your socks. She doesn't agree with abortion and the funding of abortions with tax payer money. Now, according to The Hyde Amendment, it is illegal to fund abortions with federal tax money. However, every time there's a budget battle, Democrats try to ram through federal funding of abortions. Not all Americans agree with abortion, and I would be among them. I have no problem with funding birth control and education. But, not abortion. I believe there are MANY things that can be done, prior to abortion. For example. Condoms, education about how to avoid pregnancy, other birth control options such as a diaphram or injections that prevent pregnancy. But, what is Planned Parenthood most well known for? Abortions. Period. When I think of Planned Parenthood, I don't think of screenings for Cervical Cancer or treatment for STD's. While they do provide these services, I would argue Abortions are what they're more well known for, perhaps referring to it as "family planning" in order to soften the concept.

So, SE Cupp was on the Joy Behar show, someone else whom I'm amazed has a following, but then again, bitter Liberal women who villify the Right must apparently turn somewhere as a support group when their candidates lose elections. So, Cupp gets into a debate with Jerry Springer, whom was once the major of Philidelphia until he was busted for involvement with hookers. But, the Libs love him. Never mind he was using women for sex, even if he was paying for it. In any case, the debate happened, Behar and Springer had their views, Cupp had hers, period. So then Olberman makes this off the cuff remark. He later denied that he said Cupp should be aborted. And to be fair, he didn't say that. However, what else could he have meant, hmmm? Surely he must have meant something. Did he mean that Cupp's mom could have benefitted from Cervical Cancer screening? Probably not. Maybe Cupp's mom could have benefitted from a Mamogram? Naw, probably not. Maybe he meant she could have benefitted from STD treatments? No way. So, about all that's left is "family planning", which one should read as abortion, or the use of contraceptives. Ok Olberman, so you're not outright saying SE Cupp should have been aborted, but maybe that she should simply have not been born and her mom should have used contraceptives? Oh yeah, that's WAY better Olberman. However, I think he really did mean he wished she was aborted. Libs have taken even more vague references on the part of Conservatives (targets on districts where Democrats were running for re-election as a threat to kill them for example as we recently saw with the Arizona shooting, DESPITE Libs stating they were "targeting" certain Conservatives and those Libs getting NO flack for that!) and taken them out of grandiouse context and they've been widely accepted as absolute truth by some of our top Democratic leaders including San Fran Nan Pelosi and Dingy Harry Reid among other Libs. Not only do I think Olberman was STRONGLY implying Cupp should have been aborted, but, I think he's a coward because he doesn't have the guts to admit it.

And where is NOW on this? Clearly, he was attacking Cupp. Once again, I think NOW (National Organization of Women) should change their name to NOLW (National Organization of Liberal Women) as that is clearly the type of woman they are interested in defending and supporting. Oddly enough, they've been pretty quiet on this. I did search their website and found NOTHING about this matter. They're dead silent on this. Shocking. If Olberman had said this about Hillary Clinton (yeah, right. Like THAT would ever happen), I bet NOW would have something on their opening page!

Now, for those that don't know who Olberman is, he USED to have a show on MSNBC. Low ratings and who knows what else, and he gets fired by MSNBC. Apparently he's not Liberal enough for them? Good Lord knows he said some outrageous things including talking about Obama and how much he liked him, stating "I felt a tingling up my leg and that doesn't happen very often." Please Olberman, I really don't want to know that. Please keep your "tingling" to yourself. So now, the ONLY attention Olberman can get, is from Twitter. If a Conservative man had said this about a Liberal woman, can you imagine the outrage? If Sean Hannity had said this about Hillary Clinton, I truly see protests in from of WABC demanding Hannity to be fired! But, a Lib says it, and wow! Free pass! Yet again! The double standard continues folks. If you try to tell me there is NO Liberal media, do me a favor. Spread that crap in my flower bed. The flowers will greatly benefit from the sewage coming out of your mouth.