You think so?

"I would hope that a White Male, in the richness of his experience, more often than not, would be able to reach a better conclusion (as a judge) than a Latina female who hasn't lived that life".

Outraged by the above remark? You should be. It is not a remark of racism, rather, one of prejudice. There is a difference. Prejudice is an attitude. Racism is an action. For example. Someone thinking, and even speaking, to someone of another race being "less than". That's prejudice because it's an attitude. Racism would be burning a cross on their lawn, because it's an action. It's action versus attitude.

Now, the above remark. It should make you angry. If it doesn't, something wrong with you. You should be pissed. You should demand who the crap said that, and why don't they get nailed for it. Clearly, it's from a sad mind that holds an archaic view of the world, someone who allows race to govern their thoughts, thinking perhaps their own race is far superior.

So, why then, is it that if we chance the words to this:

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion [as a judge] than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” (Court of Appeals Judge Sonia Sotomajor)

that we don't automatically consider it a prejudiced comment? Why? Because she's Hispanic? Should that matter? All we changed from the opening quote is changed it from the perspective of a white guy, to that of a Puerto Rican woman. And yet, if you're normal, or Liberal, you should be outraged by what you read. But yet, when you hear it coming from a minority, it's ok. Ah no, she can't really be saying the same thing. Oh, but she can. This fool's belief that minorities can't be prejudiced or racist, that's really just BS. You really need to use your brain for something other than hair fertilizer. And yes, I'm implying you have crap for brains. I'm talking to you, Liberals. The above quote? No one said it. I just changed the words to reflect it from a White perspective. That's it. But, the actual quote came from Sotomajor.

So, Liberals need to tread carefully here. They have warned Republicans they better "watch their step" in challenging this US Supreme Court Nomination. Sounds like someone's gearing up to play the race card. But then again, we're so used to that from the Left, does it really have any meaning any longer? It does. To them.

All I'm saying is, if someone who was White said it like the intro quote, the Left would be screaming. But, it is so silent when Sotomajor says it, you can be made deaf by the sound of the crickets. If she was stupid enough to say that, she deserves to get grilled on it. Period. It's a fair question.

Now, you have President Obama saying that she chose her words poorly. If she had the opportunity to do so, she'd say it differently. Really? You think so?! Well, Trent Lott didn't get the chance to chose his words more carefully. You Libs trashed him, and demanded his resignation as Senate Majority Leader. I'm referring to an event some years ago in which Strom Thurmon was celebrating his 100th birthday (I believe he was turning 100) and Lott stated if Thurman had been elected President "we wouldn't be having the problems we have now". Oh, the Liberal Left whackos really ran with that. Played the race card and talked non-stop about how Thurman was a Segregationist. Yet, when people asked about Robert Bryd being the former Grand Dragon in the KKK, no one said anything. Oh, that was fine, that's ok. He's Liberal. So, he gets a pass. And the point here is that Trent Lott was raked over the coals. And his job, was not a lifetime appointment like Sotomajor's is for the US Supreme Court.

I think we need to carefully examine this woman's views. If the shoe were on the other foot, the Libs would be demanding this. And, if they play the race card, the Republicans need to stop playing nice. Grow a set y'all! We need to stop imitating John McCain! We need to throw race right back at the Libs and demand they answer why they support someone who makes a clearly prejudiced comment like that! Don't let them dodge the question. Demand an answer, and stay put til they give you one. If they have you physically removed, make sure a camera is around to catch it on the TV News.

Now, if Obama believes SO strongly that she's said what she did, differently; well, here's your chance. The media is practically wetting themselves for her. Say it differently. Say it now, it'll be on 100 front page newspapers or on the TV/radio news across the world. So, say it already? Again, the crickets. I don't remember Miguel Estrada getting treated so respectfully when he was nominated for the US Court of Appeals in D.C. As I recall, the Demoncrats wouldn't even let his nomination come before the Senate. They killed it off before it even got that far. Where was the militart group, La Raza, at that time? Why wouldn't they scream racism then? But now, now they're prepared to scream it. Subserviant morons. You only support a Hispanic when it suits YOUR agenda. If you support Hispanics, it shouldn't matter their political views. You should be ashamed. And low down, dirty Libs should be ashamed for giving Sotomajor a free pass, when they would most certainly not give a free pass to a White guy who would say the intro quote. Thank God I made that up, otherwise, the guy who fictionally said it, would be hung, and a sheep mentallity America, brainwashed by the Left would chant right along with the Left for blood.

Not Socialism eh?

So, Obama has recently stated he doesn't want to run GM, he has no intention of running a car company, nor does the government have the time for that. Really? No interest in that at all, eh? So, is that why the government demanded that in order to receive federal funding, Rick Wagoner had to step down as CEO a month or more back? Is that why the government told GM, in your restructuring plan, you need to have small, fuel efficient cars? Basically, telling the car companies what kinds of cars they are to build. Shouldn't that be the decision of the company. Granted, they do need to make more strides towards fuel efficiency, but, if there is still a demand for those big (and according to the basic laws of physics, safer) cars/SUV/Trucks, why can't they be built? Realistically, will all production of them stop? No. But still, you, as the government, is telling them to stop building those kinds of cars. No excuse for that. Then again, they did agree to take money from the government. Apparently, if you make a deal with the Devil, you really DO get screwed. Am I comparing Obama to the Devil? No. I'm comparing the government to the Devil. However, since Demoncrats had no problem comparing President Bush to the Nazis, Hitler himself, and other horrible things......maybe I shouldn't have a problem with it either.


Now, we have the Chrysler Corp. The Government is making demands on them. And now, they are going into bankrupcy. About 70% of their creditors have agreed with the bankrupcy plan. About 30% disagree with it. And Obama has the balls to state that because this 30% is holding up the whole deal, that they actually expect to receive their money, "that's un-American!" Really? Well, using that logic, I guess none of the car companies have to pay the tax payers back then, huh? They can just tell the to piss off, we're not paying you back, that would be un-American! Now, we're hearing stories that government officials involved with the auto bailouts were threatening Chrysler to get them to give in. Really? You mean people that essentially fall under Obama's authority were acting inappropriately? So Obama, are you going to dodge responsibility for that too? I mean, crap! You don't take responsibility for anything else you do. More jobs being lost, more debt, rogue nations growing a bigger set of balls, all under your administration. And yet, you're not responsible. Nor are the Demoncrats in Congress mind you. Even though Demoncrats control the Majority.

And now, David "I'm a traitor" Souter is stepping down from the U.S. Supreme Court. Obama desparately wants to have a Hispanic on the court so he can brag about his appointing the first. However, President Bush beat you to the punch. He appointed the first Hispanic to the 2nd U.S. District Court of Appeals-laregely a stepping stone to the U.S. Supreme Court, but, you Demoncrats wouldn't allow the nomination to go through. Something for which the Republicans were too stupid to play the race card for! The Demoncrats cites lack of experience, they didn't like some of the things he wrote and such. Really, well, that didn't seem to stop a lot of nominations going through for Obama's nominations to his cabinet. Other U.S. Supreme Court Nominations (Roberts and Alito) were met with "they're out of the mainstream". So, it will be interesting to see what Obama considers "mainstream." Unfortunately, with the Traitor Arlen Spector switching sides just so he can get elected, which he freely admits, but decorates it with "I found it more difficult to get elected as a Republic" (I'm paraphrasing what he said here), and the cheat Al Franken trying to steal the Minnesota Senatorial Election (only wanting to count votes for him in the re-counts and then counting them a couple times), this will eliminate any fillibustering. So America, hold onto your socks! You wanted change, you go it!