It's breaking the law, period.

I understand that America is a great land of opportunity. I understand that people come here for a better life. I have no problem with people coming here. That's fine. The problem I have is that some people are coming here illegally. Basically, they're breaking the law in order to come, and stay, here in the U.S. This is a problem. Illegals are bleeding tax payer dollars dry. Did you know that some hospitals in California, specifically L.A., are on the verge of bankrupcy simply because they have to absorb the cost of illegals seeking medical care. Then, there's the fact that illegals are receiving welfare in this country. How is it that an illegal citizen can get welfare in the U.S.? How is it that they can also receive in state college tuition? It's happening right here in Washington State. The only rule is that they have had to have lived in the U.S. for a certain number of years. Ok, so, if an illegal lives in the U.S. illegally for a certain number of years, they can get cheaper college tuition. Certainly would make me wait it out wouldn't it?

There are Libs who argue that illegals are only trying to come here for a better life. Fine, so do it the legal way. Oh, but it takes too long. Yeah, know why? Cause of all the illegals! Another arguement that Libs use is that illegals only come here to work and then go back home. Oh sure. That's it. I guess that's why there's an estimated 15 million illegals in the U.S. from Mexico alone. Because I'm sure the flood to go back to Mexico is so great that they've just given up and grudgingly stay in the U.S. against their will. Yeah, that's it.

Another argument that Libs use is that only the American Indians were the only original inhabitants so, all the people who came here from Europe should go back to their own countries, cause after all, they came here illegally. Fact. There were points of entry on the East Coast and West Coast in which immigrants came through to come into the country legally. I'm sure even Libs have heard of the East Coast one. Ellis Island. So, another Lib lie debunked. As for the American Indians being the original inhabitants. Nope, sorry. Not true. Scientists have already proved that a land bridge existed between Alaska and Russia and most Indians have genetic similarities to folks in Asia. So, it can certainly be argued that American Indians were not the original inhabitants of the U.S. Sorry to bust that too. Actually, I'm not.

I'm not slamming on American Indians by the way either, so, you Libs can just put that thought out of your heads. Just pointing out an interesting fact.

So, when it comes to illegal immigration and all the Hispanics you've seen protesting, do you ever wonder why they all wave the Mexican flag? If they really loved America and were proud of all the opportunities they've been blessed with here in the U.S., then why don't they wave the American flag? Also, if they don't believe that these illegals are coming from Mexico, then why fly the Mexican flag? Seems they too know where the illegals are coming from. Even Vicente Fox, Mexico's president is not willing to admit that illegal immigrants from Mexico are not a problem. Really, perhaps hospitals and welfare agencies all over the U.S. should start sending the bill for illegals to the Mexican government and let them pay for the illegals and see how much of a problem they think it is.

The radio talk show host has suggested a solution to the problem. For every illegal that the U.S. must support, Mexico has to give us one barrel of oil for free for each illegal we have here, for each day they're here. Wonder how many barrels of oil we'll get before Mexico decides it's too much of a problem.

So, when you see these people supporting illegal immigration, ask them why it's ok for illegals to come into the country illegally. Ask them why illegal immigration from Mexico should be forgiven. And, how much is enough? I say, send 'em back, no matter what country they come from.

Another myth libs argue is that if we make illegal immigration a crime and deport them, then who will pick our fruit/veggetables? Well, I'd say, anyone on welfare. You want welfare? Get off your butt and get to work! No work, no welfare. Real simple.

No matter how you believe about this issue, it's your responsibility to write your people in Washington D.C. right now, while the issue is being debated! Log onto www.house.gov and www.senate.gov and write your people now. It's extremely important. As for either party gaining or losing votes based on this decision, just one thought. Don't sweat it cause illegals can't vote. So, it's irrelevant what illegals think! Of course, they're gonna want to stay, but, since they're illegal, I don't give a flying rats behind what they thing. Until they obey the law and come here legally, what they thing doesn't matter to me. There's a legal means for them to get here. I would support putting more money into citizenship programs to make more potential citizens, citizens. I would even support more funding for having citizenship classes at strategic locations in Mexico so that they can come into this country legally to begin with.

There is a legal process for illegals to come here legally. They purposefully chose to come here illegal. They're breaking the law. These are facts that Libs can't argue with. Send them back!

So Libs support our military huh?

"They don't read 20 newspapers a day. They're under the threat of death every minute. They're not the best people to ask about the war because they're going to die any minute." – Richard Belzer

So, according to Richard Belzer, our military are not the best people to ask about the war because they're right there and they're going to die there any minute. Apparently, Mr. Belzer, who reads 20 newspapers daily, knows more about the war than our military, who are actually there. Amazing!

This is what Mr. Belzer said (see above quote) on the Real Time with Bill Mahre Show. After searching the site and the transcripts of the show (which you can't actually get in full), the show neglects to say that Mr. Mahre states that the 18 and 19 year old men over there are only there because they can't get jobs in the U.S. A woman who was being interviewed there as well who has a son in the military, stated that her son graduated from college. Mr. Belzer goes on to say that this woman's son is obviously an exception to the rule.

This from the Liberals that claim to support our miitary. It's amazing! They support our military, but, they seem to feel that they're only there because they are too dumb to get jobs here apparently. At the same time, they also seem to believe that even though they're there in the heat of battle, they can't be trusted to make judgements about the war because they're right there in the heat of battle and, they know they could die any minute. So, they're obviously biased. Nope, only Libs like Richard Belzer, who apparently reads 20 newspapers a day, can make an unbiased opinion. So, they support the military huh?

Freedom of Speech.....

So, the Libs and Radical Left feel that this High School Teacher in Colorado, Jay Bennish, has the right to compare President Bush to Hilter. That's his freedom of speech they say. No, I say it's not. It's language that can incite problems, as we're seeing. Obviously, it was something that bothered at least one student, Sean Allen who taped the lecture where Mr. Bennish goes on to say that in his State of the Union Address, President Bush stated that he wanted Iraq to be "just like us". Mr. Bennish then made the comment that "that sounds like something Hitler would say". Hitler, of course, wanted everyone to be like them, White.

Mr. Bennish, however, failed to put the quote from President Bush in context. President Bush was referring to his wishes for Iraq, and other countries, to be just like them, Democratic. He wanted Democracies around the world. People living in freedom. So, since it appears to be clear that Mr. Bennish is against what President Bush said, I guess then he must be against Democracy. There you have it, someone on the Left that hates America. What other conclusion can one draw. He doesn't like the fact the President Bush wants other countries to be "just like us", which is to say, Democratic. So, I can only conclude the Mr. Bennish hates America, because we are a Democracy.

Now, rightfully so, this teacher was suspended. Had Mr. Bennish presented both sides, in other words, discussed the good that President Bush had done and only criticized President Bush for what he didn't like, I would have had a problem with Mr. Bennish being suspended. However, since he only presented one side, the Liberal side, then, he should have been suspended. If it had been a Conservative Teacher calling Bill Clinton a modern day Nixon in terms of having a list of enemies and going after them, and talking about how so many of Clinton's critics had their reputations attacked, then surely the teacher would have been suspended. There would have been no discussion of freedom of speech whatsoever. But, since it's a Liberal teacher comparing Bush to Hitler, then it's freedom of speech.

Let's look at one thing though. Just because you have the freedom to say something, doesn't mean you should. The founding fathers didn't create freedom of speech to "say whatever you wanted to". Nope, they created it so that you could say what you wanted, but they thought that people would have enough knowledge and brains to say something reasonable. Morons!

Nope, they didn't expect that a president, who's liberated two countries mind you, would be compared to a dictator that systematically killed 6 million Jews. Yeah, cause that's a valid comparison.

Another thing to look at. Sean Allen, the student who taped the lecture in which Mr. Bennish compared Bush to Hitler, received death threats accroding to him. His taping of the class was a violation of the teacher's privacy I have been hearing. What privacy? It's a public school! The teacher is a servant of the taxpayers! What privacy?! The guy was teaching a class in a public school. Any member of the public, providing they make arrangements with the school, can walk in there and observe the class if they wanted to! God help them if they kept me out of a school that my taxes go to pay for!

So, Sean Allen has commented that he felt this was inappropriate and wrong. Oh, but the "tolerant" lefty Libs say that the teacher had freedom to say what he wanted, but this kid who's speaking out against it, he's getting death threats likely from some of the same students that are defending the teacher's right to say what he wants. And yet, I've not heard one Lib say that this Sean Allen has the right to say his opinion! Where's the tolerance?! Where's the outcry for this kid's rights?!

According to Bennish, he also received death threats after his anti-Bush comments. That's not right. No one should be receiving death threats for what they say. If someone wants to tell these people they don't like what they said, and they don't agree with it, fine. But they should not be threatened no matter what they say! There is no excuse for that.

Bennish has told his lawyer, regarding his comments that he wanted his students to "think critically ... don't just follow hook, line and sinker everything everybody tells you." I'm fine with that. That's an appropriate comment. If he criticized Present Bush and then made the above quote, no problem. The problem I have is when he compared Bush to Hitler. There is really no excuse for that. That was not necessary.

Sean Allen doesn't seem to be shying away from what he believes about this whole situation. Why, I wonder, is Mr. Bennish? He doesn't seem to believe in shouting out his comments any longer. If he really believed in what he was saying, why doesn't he contintue to say it? At least when Warren Churchill made his Anti-Bush comments, he continued to make them despite his critics. At least Mr. Bennish could have the same guts. But he doesn't. So then, is he beginning to doubt what he said? Is he beginning to believe that what he said was wrong? Perhaps. Maybe he feels guilty. I used to teach myself, and I certainly spoke my opinion in class, but, not once did I ever compare anyone to Hitler, and I did present both sides or at least, more than one view.

Whether or not you agree with Mr. Bennish's comments, I would encourage you to send him an e-mail. Tell you agree with him and support him, or tell him you didn't like what he said and tell him you think he's wrong. It's your choice, I leave it up to you.


Jay Bennish
jbennish@cherrycreekschools.org
Overland High School

Gene For President!!

"When you go through a really bad neighborhood, you want a Rottweiller with you. When you go through a nice neighborhood, you want a nice French Poodle. NOT a good idea to have a friendly, nice haircut French Poodle when you go through a bad neighborhood. By the way, Rottweillers sometimes bite your kids and stuff like that, but in time of war, I want a Rottweiller."

-- Gene Simmons, on President Bush.


This comment was made recently by Gene Simmons, bass player of the legendary band KISS. What I find amazing is that Gene gets it, while most Liberals don't. We are in a time of war. It didn't start out as a religious war, but, Muslim Terrorists want it to be one SO bad. There are extremists in any religion, including my own, Christianity. However, Gene gets it. When you have people who want to blow you up and kill you, as the terrorists have proclaimed many, many times, why on earth would you want a perfectly hair cut and manicured French poodle? One who's gonna play nicey nice and who will bend over (probably in the same fashion as Kevin Bacon in Animal House- "thank you sir, may I please have another?!") and make the terrorists as comfortable as possible! The terrorists should not be made to feel comfortable right now. We're going through a bad neightborhood right now, so, why on earth would be want a French Poodle (I think Gene was actually referring to John Kerry, as Johnny if French if I remember correctly) to take us through this neighborhood?

Gene would apparently rather have a Rottweiller when going through a bad neighborhood. Know what? So would I. But then again, let's look at the Liberal Mentality. If they get robbed, rather than thinking poorly of the person who robbed them and blamming them, they rather ask "what did I do to cause this too happen? Could I have done something to stop it?" No, you didn't do anything. Someone came after you. You were simply living and walking or whatever you were doing. It was the criminal that came after you. Just as the Terrorists came after us, we didn't do anything to provoke this. Notice the only ones who say it's America's fault for 9/11 and all the Terror is Liberals? Still believe they don't hate America? HA!

The usual arguments are that America supports the Israelis, so, that puts us on the Terrorists hit list. Next, we are in good relations with Saudi Arabia, which the Muslim Terrorists see mainly as corrupt. The other reasons really don't matter to me, they all run along the same lines as "everything is America's fault". Oddly enough, the same thing that Liberals say. You know, when Liberals and Terrorists are saying the same things, more or less, why on earth would you vote Democrat?

Gene for President!