Yes, context matters, but so do your words.....
Regarding this whole ridiculous Sherrod thing. This is that black woman who, she says, was forced to resign due to comments she made 24 years ago about her reluctance to help a White Farmer, as she is black and many black farmers were also suffering. Her complaint is that, well, I helped the guy. But, her exact words were "I helped enough" and that "I didn't do everything I could". She goes on to say that she knew he was going to report to either the Feds or the State of Georgia that she had tried to help him, so, she basically did enough to keep herself from getting into trouble and to make it look good. Ok, that implies some planning and intelligence on her part. She did just enough to get by, and to keep out of trouble with all the right people. Now, for a moment, imagine if a WHITE person had did this to a BLACK person. What would the reaction be? Hmmm? Can you say RACIST?! Exactly, they would be labeled a racist, as well they should be. The color of a person's skin DOES NOT MATTER. If they need help, you help them. If it's your job to help someone, you help them and do what you are supposed to do. You're not supposed to sit there and say, well gee, I could do ALL this stuff, but, since they're White, I'm only going to do this......
And everyone seems to be overlooking that! Oh, well, the video was "taken out of context". And yes, context DOES matter, but, so does what you said. And I'm not buying this Liberal notion of "she mis-spoke" crap. Every time it's a Lib, they "mis-spoke", but every time it's a Conservative, HOLY CRAP, THAT'S how they really feel.
Ok, something that the Lamestream (now proven to be Liberally biased as evidenced by the Liberal Media's attempt to cover up the Reverent Wright fiasco) is not covering is Ms. Sherrod's thoughts on the "haves vs. have nots". You know, I've NEVER worked for the Department of Agriculture, but, I'm pretty sure that you making those kind of calls has nothing to do with your job description. I'm pretty sure in your job description is something about guidelines for what you can, and can't do to help someone. I'm sure there's financial eligibility requirements, and I'm pretty sure the skin color of someone seeking help is irrelevant. So, what she's "secretly" doing is putting power into "class warfare". Pitting the haves vs. have-nots. This, of course, is one of the bastions of Democrats. You know, Karl Marx and such. Any doubts about it, please feel free to read Karl Marx and Friederich Engels Communist Manifesto, and then see how close that is to what Democrats have been saying for years! I've read the thing, it's dry, but, if you think about it politically, it's actually quite fascinating. And note, I'm not saying that Conservatives are angels here. But, I certainly think it's dangerous for this philosophy. In an ideal world, communal living MAY have worked. But, I honestly don't think so because someone is ALWAYS going to have something that someone else doesn't have, and they'll want. Then they'll cry about how it's not fair, etc. And in walk the Libs saying something about how it's some Constitutional Right to have that, or some crap like that.
You know what my folks taught me? You want something? Earn it. Work for it. Someone shouldn't rely on the Government for anything. I think it makes you weak. I think it builds character to give it your all. Call it simplistic if you like, but, I think it gives one a real sense of achievement. Now, are there some factors that flat out prevent certain segments of our society from succeeding? Possibly so, but I think people give up too easily, and I think if it requires more effort than changing the channel on their remote control, their attitude is screw it! It's cause I'm (insert racial group here). At that point, you're using your race as an excuse. Stop wallowing, and start DOING. Crap will not be handed to you for free. Period. There's gonna most likely be a cost somewhere. The cost may be, you have to work to get it, you may have to put in effort, whatever. If you really need it, I guess then you'll have to do whatever it takes. Otherwise, I guess you can just roll over and die if you like. But don't blame me or the government cause it's easier to make an excuse than to actually do something.
People can cite all kinds of things about how it's not fair, and how they've been discriminated against, etc. Uh huh. I can do the same thing too. I'm a White Male. How many scholarships you see for that, huh? I see them for black only all the time, American Indian, women only, homosexuals only, etc. Well, that seems pretty "reverse discrimination" to me. And, there will be those that argue that "well, you're privileged cause you're White". Well gosh, that seems like a stereotype don't it? Just cause I'm White you think my life's easy? Cause I'm White, I'm assumed to be a racist, I'm assumed to have "the easy life". I NEVER got one scholarship to college. Not one. I didn't qualify for financial aid. I had help from my parents as well as worked my way through. So, don't give me that class warfare crap. You want to engage in that crap, and get a "free" hand out. Hey, you have your choice of countries for that. North Korea and Cuba are Communist. Feel free to move there to get your "freebies".
And Ms. Sherrod should TOTALLY be held accountable for her thoughts on what she said. Her initial reluctance to help someone who's White, which she admits by her own words, as well as her thoughts on class warfare. And the NAALCP (National Association for the Advancement of Liberal Colored People) cries about the Tea Party having racists. Did you see the people in that audience that Ms. Sherrod spoke to? They clapped, they cheered. They liked what she said. So, I denounce the NAALCP as racists as evidenced by that video. And Ben Jealous (current leader of the NAALCP) did not denounce that. Instead, the organization says they were "snookered" by the Tea Party and Foxnews. Really, so all us Moron rednecks who like Fox outsmarted you guys huh? Guess that makes you REAL idiots then huh? I'd like to hear the NAALCP denounce the racists in their own organization. I'll be waiting a LONG time I think.
And everyone seems to be overlooking that! Oh, well, the video was "taken out of context". And yes, context DOES matter, but, so does what you said. And I'm not buying this Liberal notion of "she mis-spoke" crap. Every time it's a Lib, they "mis-spoke", but every time it's a Conservative, HOLY CRAP, THAT'S how they really feel.
Ok, something that the Lamestream (now proven to be Liberally biased as evidenced by the Liberal Media's attempt to cover up the Reverent Wright fiasco) is not covering is Ms. Sherrod's thoughts on the "haves vs. have nots". You know, I've NEVER worked for the Department of Agriculture, but, I'm pretty sure that you making those kind of calls has nothing to do with your job description. I'm pretty sure in your job description is something about guidelines for what you can, and can't do to help someone. I'm sure there's financial eligibility requirements, and I'm pretty sure the skin color of someone seeking help is irrelevant. So, what she's "secretly" doing is putting power into "class warfare". Pitting the haves vs. have-nots. This, of course, is one of the bastions of Democrats. You know, Karl Marx and such. Any doubts about it, please feel free to read Karl Marx and Friederich Engels Communist Manifesto, and then see how close that is to what Democrats have been saying for years! I've read the thing, it's dry, but, if you think about it politically, it's actually quite fascinating. And note, I'm not saying that Conservatives are angels here. But, I certainly think it's dangerous for this philosophy. In an ideal world, communal living MAY have worked. But, I honestly don't think so because someone is ALWAYS going to have something that someone else doesn't have, and they'll want. Then they'll cry about how it's not fair, etc. And in walk the Libs saying something about how it's some Constitutional Right to have that, or some crap like that.
You know what my folks taught me? You want something? Earn it. Work for it. Someone shouldn't rely on the Government for anything. I think it makes you weak. I think it builds character to give it your all. Call it simplistic if you like, but, I think it gives one a real sense of achievement. Now, are there some factors that flat out prevent certain segments of our society from succeeding? Possibly so, but I think people give up too easily, and I think if it requires more effort than changing the channel on their remote control, their attitude is screw it! It's cause I'm (insert racial group here). At that point, you're using your race as an excuse. Stop wallowing, and start DOING. Crap will not be handed to you for free. Period. There's gonna most likely be a cost somewhere. The cost may be, you have to work to get it, you may have to put in effort, whatever. If you really need it, I guess then you'll have to do whatever it takes. Otherwise, I guess you can just roll over and die if you like. But don't blame me or the government cause it's easier to make an excuse than to actually do something.
People can cite all kinds of things about how it's not fair, and how they've been discriminated against, etc. Uh huh. I can do the same thing too. I'm a White Male. How many scholarships you see for that, huh? I see them for black only all the time, American Indian, women only, homosexuals only, etc. Well, that seems pretty "reverse discrimination" to me. And, there will be those that argue that "well, you're privileged cause you're White". Well gosh, that seems like a stereotype don't it? Just cause I'm White you think my life's easy? Cause I'm White, I'm assumed to be a racist, I'm assumed to have "the easy life". I NEVER got one scholarship to college. Not one. I didn't qualify for financial aid. I had help from my parents as well as worked my way through. So, don't give me that class warfare crap. You want to engage in that crap, and get a "free" hand out. Hey, you have your choice of countries for that. North Korea and Cuba are Communist. Feel free to move there to get your "freebies".
And Ms. Sherrod should TOTALLY be held accountable for her thoughts on what she said. Her initial reluctance to help someone who's White, which she admits by her own words, as well as her thoughts on class warfare. And the NAALCP (National Association for the Advancement of Liberal Colored People) cries about the Tea Party having racists. Did you see the people in that audience that Ms. Sherrod spoke to? They clapped, they cheered. They liked what she said. So, I denounce the NAALCP as racists as evidenced by that video. And Ben Jealous (current leader of the NAALCP) did not denounce that. Instead, the organization says they were "snookered" by the Tea Party and Foxnews. Really, so all us Moron rednecks who like Fox outsmarted you guys huh? Guess that makes you REAL idiots then huh? I'd like to hear the NAALCP denounce the racists in their own organization. I'll be waiting a LONG time I think.
posted by nonfreak at 2:52 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home