Friday, June 25, 2010

Lack of a moral compass. Big time.






Here we go again with Hollywood. They seem to believe that they are above the law, and, as long as you're talented enough, you should be able to not be held accountable to your actions. Even if you've admitted to them. Once again folks, we're talking about Roman Polanski. He continues to be held and, God willing, will be brought to justice for raping a 13 year old girl. Again however, Hollywood and the entertainment elitists feel that since he's such a talented director, he should be let free. In fact, they don't think he should be let free, they DEMAND it! How much do they demand it? Well, so much that they have a petition. The morons signed their name to it. So, within these confines, I shall reveal the names of the moral morons and those that, apparently, don't have a problem with an ADULT MALE RAPING A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL. Providing he's a talented director apparently. Thank God he doesn't suck as a director, or, they may want his head on a plate, right? So, below find the petition.


Roman Polanski Petition Signatures


Pedro ALmodovar

Asia Argento

Jean-Jacques Annaud

Wes ANderson

Darren Aronofsky

Fanny Ardan

Asia Argento

Olivier Assayas

Babriel Auer

Christophe Barratier

Gilles Behat

Marco Bellochio

Monica Bellucci

Jean-Jacques Beineix

Patrick Bouchitey

Jacques Bral

Andre Buytaers

Christian Carion

Henning Carlsen

Jean-Michel Carre

Patrice Chereau

Elie Chouraqui

Souleymane Cisse

Alian Corneau

Jerome Cornuau

Miguel Courtois

ALfonso Cuaron

Jonathan Demme

Alexandre Desplat

Georges Dybman

Betrand Van Effenterre

Jacques Fansten

Michel Ferry

Stephen Frears

Theirry Fremaux

Sam Babarski

Tony Gatlif

Costa gavras

Jean-Marc Ghanassia

Christian Gion

David Heyman

Laurent Heynemann

Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu

illes Jacob

Just Jaeckin'Pierre Jolivet

Nelly Kaplan

Wong Kar Wai

Jan Kounen

Harmony Korinne

Emir Kusturica

John Landis

Claude Lanzmann

Patrice Leconte

Michael Mann

Francois Margolin

Mariol Martone

Radul Mihaileanu

Jeanne Moreau

Andre Larquie

Claude Lelouche

Claude Miller

Michel Ocelot

ALexander Payne

Michele Placido

Jean-Paul Rappeneau

Yasmina Reza

Laurence roulet

Walter Salles

Jean-Paul Salome

Marc Sandberg

Julian Schnabel

Barbet Schroeder

Ettore Scola

Abderrrahmane Sissako

Paolo Sorrentino

Tilda Swinton

Radovan Tadic

Danis Tanovic

Bertrand Tavernier

Cecile Teleman

ALain Terzian

Pascal Thomas

Giuseppe Tornatore

Serge Toubiana

Nadine Trintignant

Tom Tykwer

Wim Wender


Ok. Some of these losers are French. Isn't that the country were they pretty much show porn on daytime TV? Ok, so no suprise there. Now, some of these LOSERS we really know. John Landis. Some are not on this list, but, Martin Scorsese is another. Michael Douglas, interestingly, refused to sign it because he felt he couldn't sign a document for someone who committed a crime like rape, for which he already admitted to. Good for you Mike, I'm watching all your movies! This list serves more as a way to know what entertainers NOT to support. Up to you if you want to suppor them, but, keep in mind. They don't have a problem with someone raping a 13 year old girl provided they're a "great" director. They should be ashamed of themselves, and should be confronted with their strong belief in Polanski needing to be released. Note, these idiots DON'T deny he did it. They just want him to go free.


Next. Remember Murphy Brown? Well, Candice Bergen had a comment about Roman. Find it below:


"The Roman thing is complicated as we all know. It brings out the dark, avenging side of America, yet, it is a crime. It was absolutely a criminal, indecent, amoral act and should be acknowledged and in some way paid for. But he is a brilliant, gifted artist. He is a father. ANd he is 75. How mcuh time should he serve? And why is he not allowed to be home in Switzerland under house arrest? With his kids? Why in prison? What should not happen is his being made an example of with a harsh sentence. There should be a resolution that factors in his contributions and his age. Prolonged house arrest?"


Ok, many things coming out of this moron's mouth that are wrong. First, it's not complicated. HE RAPED A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL! Pretty simple. Next, "it brings out the dark avenging side of America, yet, it is a crime." Dark avenging side? You're making it sound like people don't want the punishment to fit the crime. Hey, I don't think the punishment was enough. He was supposed to serve, what, 45 days? For raping a 13 year old? I don't call that "avenging" Candice. I call it "overly liberal" with letting him get away with it. It's an "amoral" act? Nope, pretty sure it's an "immoral" act. It's clear that what he was doing, he knew as wrong because he told her not to tell her parents about it (as we'll see from the transcript here in a bit). Amoral should suggest he doesn't know right from wrong. Well, if that's the case, why'd he tell her to keep her mouth shut? Next. Justice is blind. JUSTICE DOESN'T CARE WHAT HE DOES FOR A LIVING. He is to be judged for what he did, not what he's doing now! I don't give a flying rats butt about his "contributions" to society. He raped. Period. He did wrong. Period. He could feed the world 100 times over and I still wouldn't care. Rape is NEVER ok! "He is a father". Yep, and maybe he should have his kids taken away since he's a rapist. Who cares if he's 75?! How is that relevant? He was only supposed to seve a set period of time, which he fled. So, age is irrelevant. Had he not ran, he would have served it by now. Now, he can serve the time, plus, being a fugitive from justice for decades. His choice. No one forced him to do it Now, he has to pay the penalty. He likes rape so much, I'm sure he can experience first hand in prison in America. He can film his own porn for all I care. "How much time should he serve?" We've covered this Candice. If you could read, you'd know how much time he was supposed to serve. Why can't be serve the time in Switzerland? Because Candice. He can't. Why he can't is irrelevant. The crime was committed in the US. He needs to serve it in the US. If you hate our law, LEAVE. "Why in prison?" Because that's where rapists should go. Although, I think Hell is a great place for him to go to for being a rapist, admitting to it, and being convicted of it. What example? He isn't being made an example for what he did, he's being made an example because he ran to escape punishment for what he did. Dense Liberals! "There should be a resolution that factors in his contributions and his age. Prolonged hosue arrest?" No Candice. No. Justice is blind, there is NO factoring in anything. He broke the law. Period. Maybe you'd like to look at rapists and child molestors now, and see what their "contributions" were and maybe they should be set free? NO!


Ok, so, Candice is a brain dead moron. Now, for the actual court transcript. Warning, it's somewhat graphic. But, for those that think he should go free because of his "greatness", you need to read this or shut yer yap!




On March 10, 1977, Planski picked up the 13 year old victim at her house and took her to Jack Nicholson's home for a modeling shoot. The victim testified that Polanski served her champagne and gave her part of a Quaalude before getting in a whirlpool bath with her while they were naked. No one else was home.


Q: What happened then?


A: He goes "come down here" and I said "no, no, I got ot get out." And he goes, "no, come down here." And then I said that I had asthma and that I couldn't-I had to get out because of the warm air and the cold air or soemthing like that. And he said "just come down here for a second." So I finally went down. And then he went-there was a lot of Whirlpool bath jets. He does "Doesn't it feel better down here?" And he was like holding me up because it is almost over my head. And I went "yeah, but I better get out." So, I got out.


The victim testified that after she left the whirlpool bath, Polanski told her to go into a nearby bedroom and lie down.


A: I was going "no, I think I better go home" because I was afraid. So I just went and I saw down on the couch.


Q: What were you afraid of?


A: Him.


(A few minutes later)


A: He sat down beside me and asked me if I was ok.


Q: What did you say, if anything?


A: I said "no".


Q: What did he say?


A: He goes, "well, you 'll be better." And I go, "no, I won't. I have to go home."


Q: What happened then?


A: He reached over and he kissed me. And I was telling him, "no," you know, "keep away".


After Polanski kissed her, the victim alleged, he began to engage in oral sex.


A: ...I was ready to cry. I was kind of-I was going, "no. Come on. Stop it." But I was afraid.


Q: And what did he say, if anything?


A: He wasn't saying anything that I can remember. He was--sometimes he was saying stuff, but I was just blocking him out, you know.



The victim testified that Planksi began having sex with her, but sodomized her when he learned she wasn't using birth control.


A: He asked, he goes, "are you on the pill?" And I went, "no" and he goes, "when did you last have your period?" And I said, "I don't know. A week or two. I'm not sure."


Q: And what did he say?


A: Yes. He goes, "would you want me to go through your back? And I went "no."



The victim testified that after the sex, she got dressed and waited in the car for Polanski to drive her home. Before driving her home, he asked her to keep the incident a secret.


A: He said to me, he goes, "oh, don't tell your mother about this"...


Q: What did you say?


A: I wasn't saying anything. He says "dont' tell your mother about this and don't tell your boyfriend either." ...He said something like, "This is our secret" and I went "yeah" and then later he said, "you know, when I first met you I promosed myself I wouldn't do anything like this with you."



Source: Transcript of the grand jury testimony in The People of the State of California v. Roman Raymond Polanski. March 24, 1977.



So Hollywood Libs. That's what you're defending. A rapist that, despite MANY NO's, raped her anyway. This is what that monster did to this girl. And you defend him. You are worthless scum. You're worse than Polanski because he at least admitted to what he did. You already know, and despite that, defend him anyway.


It's up to you folks. If you want to support people who think raping a 13 year old girl is ok, knock yourself out. Hope you sleep well. I never will support these morons. Not with my money. I will, however, support Michael Douglas. At least he had the guts to stand up for what's right.



0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home